U know i find certain argument so defective, flawed, senseless that I am lost for words.
Lawyers are actually not being united, thats like not serving justice to the whole sg, whole world, whole universe and especially UFOS and ETS.
Consider my argument, if lawyers want to dispute about whether it is "accountable" to take high class flights to do official, unofficial, off duty time, on duty time watever, ok, in short WORK.
Hello, u want to talk about accountability, ok lets consider when u want to discuss accountability. Is this professional society a government professional body,a LLP (limited liability partnership) or simply a Pte Ltd?
If u see its 'client base', is it earning profits, how does singaporeans see it, is it receiving gov instructions, is it some how bound to have obligations, or the original purpose of setting it up in the first place?
If u say ok,it is a government body, we have obligations to answer to gov, we serve sg citizens regardless whether they pay us or not, we are answerable to how singaporeans perceive us, we represent the legal environment of sg to the rest of the world.Then we should see the this society as gov body regulating legal field. It is a yardstick how we measure agst other similar societies, then it is very not accountable to spend money on high class flights. Other gov bodies, statutory boards, professional bodies somehow linked to gov in ways are not doing this, therefore this society cant do this.In short, DUN TAKE business class.
If you argue that this society doesnt have a '.com.sg. gov website', its impression to everybody is NOT GOV regulation board, it is a LLP.
Ok, so sometimes law firms are small, so they serve less financially well citizens but bigger law firms are serving huge corporations. We are not liable to answer to government how much we earn, we are free to choose niche client market. It is business talk.But when we did something serious, eg pocketing money in convenyancing, and we are duly punished for our misbehavior, we are considered LLP. We are have limited liability to answer to government.
In other words, fly all u want, But one day, some tax agency or some police many step and acccuse u of using other people's money to do work.
Now, if you consider this society as PTE LTD. Well fly all u want, Virgin Airlines boss is flying all he wants. Playboy magazine founder is not responsible for his invention and he is getting married to a new (ANOTHER) girl. He is strictly a business man and u knw what thats his personal lifestyle habit. As a private business man, we cant blame his extravagant life style. His money, he is right to spend his own money.
SO my question is, if after this nonsense of considering the nature of business,we still cant decide what really is this nature of business.....then very well, push it to the question of market comparison, are other countries facing similar irritating problems of identity crisis, what the hell do we stand for?
Then simply push it to God, what is god's perspective about this. Appeal to higher noble sense of humans. Does god thinks this a teacup squabbles, is this not about wasting time, money,arguing universal truth, half truth half facts, purely empirical truths, facts or simply, a option airlines companies offer to earn more money?
Cant argue anymore abt business nature, god's intentions, then i tell u, one day our goverment will just do FIDREC. I will listen to everybody opinions, and u know wat, MY DECISION IS FINAL.
Next day: 'XYZ society identity crisis successfully resolved'
Yipee hurray, no more argument!
Labels: i cant believe newspapers at all